An easy look into my personal background on this site will verify the fact that I’m a huge follower of relationship researches. I am fascinated because of the techniques we attempt to apply science to intercourse and really love, in hopes of a single day being able to explain the mysterious means of the heart.

Some studies provide fascinating insight into modern-day mating rituals, but some (or even most) tend to be, as publisher Nick Nadel puts it, “forehead-slappingly apparent.” Nadel obtained a list of 10 researches that most definitely fall into aforementioned classification. Below are a few of features:

Questionable Study #1: experts at Radboud college of Nijmegen from inside the Netherlands found that men generally have difficulty carrying out intellectual jobs after socializing with members of the exact opposite sex. Simply put, Nadel claims, “interacting with females tends to make men foolish.”

Nadel’s simply take: “As obvious researches go, this option is actually up there with ‘people occasionally bend reality online.'” It shouldn’t simply take an investigation team to determine that men’s room minds have distracted around females.

My personal ideas: i need to edge with Nadel with this one. It ought ton’t appear as a shock that men’s brains get slightly addled around attractive females, and that I bet that a report on women’s brains would realize that these are generally just as addled around attractive males.

Questionable learn #2: in line with the results of 1 of OkCupid’s many studies on OkTrends weblog, individuals who utilize Twitter each and every day have smaller connections than those who do perhaps not.

Nadel’s simply take: OkCupid does not also believe their unique results. a representative for all the website mentioned “regrettably, we now have no chance to inform that’s dumping just who right here; perhaps the Twitterati are more frustrating or simply just even more flighty than everyone.” To put it differently, there isn’t any real proof that Twitter has actually almost anything to perform with all the period of a relationship.

My personal mind: If the folks accountable for the study are not actually sure what their unique findings are, they can be perhaps not worth paying much awareness of. The OkTrends scientific studies are several enjoyable, but are certainly not the definitive phrase on all things online dating.

Dubious Study # 3: the duration of a man’s ring finger is related to their attractiveness, relating to a group on University of Geneva in Switzerland. The ratio that compares the size of a man’s list finger to his ring-finger is called “2D:4D.”

Nadel’s simply take: the research says that guys with extended band fingers have “rugged, caveman-like” confronts. “Right,” Nadel says, “because females always select the caveman look. It isn’t like the our most widely used male celebs tend to be non-threatening, baby-faced types or everything.”

My ideas: many reports examining female perception of male appeal are finding that women are keen on several types of men during various levels of these monthly period rounds. A lady could, therefore, be thinking about both “baby-faced types” plus the “rugged cavemen” over the course of monthly. And as far as fingers get, “correlation isn’t causation” – though there could be a match up between thumb duration and appeal, one does not necessarily result in the different.

Stay tuned in for more frivolous results and absurd researches from Nick Nadel and TruTV…

check it out now!

TruTV Matters Down “10 Dumb Gender & Commitment Studies”